I have 2 major concerns.
-
The contract may be predictable but people deploying new tokens are not.
One may easily mint any token on this type of a protocol, buy 99% of the circulating supply from the contract, entice more people to buy it through the platform, then sell on top of everyone who ever buys. Just like regular centralized finance. -
This “This simple machine tries to accumulate as much ERG as possible and use accumulated ERGs to regularly pump AC in the pool.” is a contradictory statement.
It’s either the contract attempts to accumulate ERG or it will accumulate shitcoins, if it sells the ERG at a fixed rate to buy these shitcoins then there is no accumulation of ERG you could say it simply uses ERG as an intermediary coin. (Not to mention it creates a predictable dump cycle for ergo which is not a healthy sign in a market)
Also, if the contract will buy-back these shitcoins will it also be selling them? At that rate does the contract become deciding factor behind the success or failure of these coins?
Tldr: this sounds economically painful to ERG itself, I would be interested to hear counterpoints to convince myself otherwise.